Comparison of Efficacy of Bolus Dosages of Norepinephrine, Phenylephrine, and Ephedrine in Treating Post-Spinal Hypotension During Elective Cesarean Section: A Randomized Double-Blinded Controlled Trial

Anilkumar Sangappa Ganeshnavar, Archana Endigeri, Prashant Kumar Reddy Chitti, Vinduja Nair, Chaitra Konappanavar

Abstract


Background: Phenylephrine and ephedrine are widely used to manage spinal-induced hypotension after cesarean section. Norepinephrine is an alternative vasopressor that maintains the heart rate. This study compared the efficacy and safety of bolus administration of norepinephrine, phenylephrine, and ephedrine for treating post-spinal hypotension during elective cesarean section.

Methods: This prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial included patients between 20–45 years of age undergoing elective cesarean section; they were randomized into three groups receive norepinephrine 6 µg (Group A, n = 45), phenylephrine 100 µg (Group B, n = 45), or ephedrine 6 mg (Group C, n = 45) boluses after a 20% drop in blood pressure. The primary objective was to compare the efficacy (total doses required) and safety (maternal complications) of treating post-spinal hypotension. Secondary objectives assessed neonatal outcomes using fetal arterial blood gas and Apgar scores. Mean differences were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance at a 95% confidence level (α = 0.05).

Result: The total number of drug boluses required to treat maternal hypotension was significantly lower in group A (1.78 ± 0.74) than in groups B (1.93 ± 0.69) and C (2.38 ± 0.81) (F = 7.89; p < 0.001). Tachycardia occurred more frequently in group C (37.8%) than in groups A (15.6%) and B (26.7%) (p = 0.001). The incidence of bradycardia was higher in group B (24.4%) than in groups A (20%) and C (6.7%) (p = 0.001). Maternal complications were comparable between the groups, with no significant differences in neonatal outcomes.

Conclusion: Norepinephrine is a potent drug with a better hemodynamic profile than phenylephrine and ephedrine.


Keywords


Norepinephrine, Phenylephrine, Ephedrine, Caesarean section, spinal anaesthesia, hypotension

Full Text:

PDF

References


Hasanin A, Mokhtar AM, Badawy AA, Fouad R. Post-spinal anesthesia hypotension during cesarean delivery, a review article. Egypt J Anaesth. 2017; 33:189-193.

Kinsella S, Carvalho B, Dyer R, et al. International consensus statement on the management of hypotension with vasopressors during caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2018;73:71-92.

Gunasekaran P, Elakkumanan LB, Balach H, Satyaprakash M. Comparing slow and rapid bolus of ephedrine in pregnant patients undergoing planned cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2017;33:92-6. doi:10.4103/0970-9185.202183

Xu C, Liu S, Huang YZ, Guo XW, Xiao HB, Qi DY. Phenylephrine vs ephedrine in caesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2018; 60:48-59.

Mets B. Should norepinephrine, rather than phenylephrine, be considered the primary vasopressor in anesthetic practice? Anesth Analg. 2016;122:1707–14. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001239

Choudhary M, Bajaj JK. Study comparing phenylephrine bolus and infusion for maternal hypotension and neonatal outcome during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Anesth Essays Res. 2018; 12:446-51. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_23_18

Kee WD. The use of vasopressors during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Curr Opin Anesthesiol. 2017; 30:319-25. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000453

Heesen M, Rijs K, Hilber N, et al. Ephedrine versus phenylephrine as a vasopressor for spinal anaesthesia-induced hypotension in parturients undergoing high-risk caesarean section: meta-analysis, meta-regression and trial sequential analysis. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2019;37:16-28. doi:10.1016/j.ijoa.2018.10.006.

Xian W, Shen X, Liu S, Yang J, Xu S. The efficacy and safety of norepinephrine and its feasibility as a replacement for phenylephrine to manage maternal hypotension during elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. Biomed Res Int. 2018: 1869189. doi: 10.1155/2018/1869189.

Ling D, Qian D, Xiumei S, Yang L, Yuelan W. Comparison of prophylactic bolus norepinephrine and phenylephrine on hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2017; 10:12315-21. doi:IJCEM0057154

Onwochei DN, Ngan KW, Fung L, Downey K, Xiang YY, Carvalho JC. Norepinephrine intermittent intravenous boluses to prevent hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: A sequential allocation dose finding study. Anesth Analg. 2017; 125:212-8.

Sharkey AM, Siddiqui N, Downey K, Xiang YY, Guevara J, Carvalho JC. Comparison of intermittent intravenous boluses of phenylephrine and norepinephrine to prevent and treat spinal-induced hypotension in cesarean deliveries: randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2019;129(5):1312-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003704

Phogat A, Kavishvar N. Comparison of Norepinephrine with Ephedrine Boluses for the Treatment of Maternal Hypotension during Cesarean Section Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Prospective Observational Study. Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia and Critical Care. 2023 Jul 1;13(2):198-203. doi: 10.4103/JOACC.JOACC_16_23

Xu S, Shen X, Liu S, Yang J, Wang X. Efficacy and safety of norepinephrine versus phenylephrine for the management of maternal hypotension during cesarean delivery with spinal anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine. 2019;98: e14331. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014331

Ngan Kee WD, Lee SW, Ng FF, Tan PE, Khaw KS. Randomized double-blinded comparison of norepinephrine and phenylephrine for maintenance of blood pressure during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology. 2015;122(4):736-745. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000000601

Medlej K, Kazzi AA, Chehade AE, Eldine MS, Chami A, Bachir R, et al. Complications from administration of vasopressors through peripheral venous catheters: An observational study. J Emeg Med. 2018; 54:47-53.

Biricik E, Karacaer F, Ünal İ, Sucu M, Ünlügenç H. O efeito de epinefrina, norepinefrina e fenilefrina no tratamento da hipotensão pós‐raquianestesia: estudo clínico comparativo [The effect of epinephrine for the treatment of spinal-hypotension: comparison with norepinephrine and phenylephrine, clinical trial]. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2020;70(5):500-507. doi:10.1016/j.bjan.2020.04.017




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21776/ub.jap.2024.005.03.04

Refbacks



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.